ProgramBench task detail

bensadeh__tailspin.6278437

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

615generated behavioral tests
88.0%official best score
81.0%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 81.0% ok 498/615 $7.03 84 0.31h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 35.8% ok 220/615 n/a 63 0.19h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 33.2% ok 204/615 n/a 48 0.16h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

81.0% from 498/615 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 123, passed: 662.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • 86ccb6017898 eval.tests.test_configuration.test_config_path_invalid_toml (failure)
  • 86ccb6017898 eval.tests.test_configuration.test_config_path_valid (failure)
  • 86ccb6017898 eval.tests.test_configuration.test_config_with_custom_styles (failure)
  • 8d05e17648bb eval.tests.test_config.test_config_with_multiple_keywords (failure)
  • 8d05e17648bb eval.tests.test_follow_mode.test_follow_flag_short (failure)
  • 8d05e17648bb eval.tests.test_follow_mode.test_follow_and_print_flags_together (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 88.0% $15.26 97
2 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 77.9% $3.64 33
3 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 75.8% $58.91 840
4 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 75.6% $2.18 65
5 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 74.0% $26.95 265
6 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 72.0% $20.30 324
7 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 68.5% $1.45 24
8 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 62.9% $0.10 10
9 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 59.7% $0.26 8
10 Gemini 3 Flash Google 56.6% $0.67 130
11 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 26.2% $0.02 13
12 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 2.1% $1.56 51
13 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 0.0% $0.87 101