ProgramBench task detail

canop__broot.d6c798e

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

539generated behavioral tests
67.0%official best score
61.8%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 61.8% ok 333/539 $4.80 52 0.17h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 60.9% ok 328/539 n/a 42 0.15h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 39.1% ok 211/539 n/a 26 0.14h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

61.8% from 333/539 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: error: 2, failure: 271, passed: 577.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch, terminal rendering mismatch.

  • 35a40756148c eval.tests.test_tui_advanced (error)
  • 35a40756148c eval.tests.test_tui_pexpect (error)
  • 92f620e1a32a tests.test_config.test_write_default_conf_basic (failure)
  • 92f620e1a32a tests.test_config_extended.test_write_default_conf_with_symlink_destination (failure)
  • 92f620e1a32a tests.test_config.test_conf_flag_with_nonexistent_file (failure)
  • 92f620e1a32a tests.test_config.test_conf_flag_with_malformed_file (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 67.0% $14.42 241
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 66.4% $11.09 83
3 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 62.3% $1.89 24
4 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 60.9% $1.57 58
5 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 59.0% $6.43 140
6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 56.4% $23.30 406
7 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 52.5% $2.80 149
8 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 51.9% $4.81 46
9 Gemini 3 Flash Google 37.3% $0.23 42
10 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 33.6% $0.43 99
11 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 31.4% $0.01 9
12 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 18.2% $0.42 7
13 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 7.2% $0.08 28