ProgramBench task detail

cheat__cheat.b8098dc

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

297generated behavioral tests
71.7%official best score
69.4%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 69.4% ok 206/297 $6.81 116 0.30h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 40.7% ok 121/297 n/a 44 0.14h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 39.4% ok 117/297 n/a 68 0.19h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

69.4% from 206/297 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 91, passed: 215, skipped: 1.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • 06dabfabaea7 tests.test_clone_installer.test_installer_creates_all_expected_dirs (failure)
  • 06dabfabaea7 tests.test_config.test_invalid_formatter_error (failure)
  • 06dabfabaea7 tests.test_config.test_config_missing_editor_field (failure)
  • 06dabfabaea7 tests.test_completions.test_empty_shell_name_error (failure)
  • 06dabfabaea7 tests.test_config.test_invalid_colorize_type_error (failure)
  • 06dabfabaea7 tests.test_clone_installer.test_installer_clone_yes (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 71.7% $9.93 81
2 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 66.7% $4.69 60
3 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 59.9% $5.80 198
4 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 57.6% $0.95 14
5 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 50.5% $14.36 373
6 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 49.2% $3.11 86
7 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 45.1% $0.40 10
8 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 22.9% $1.20 70
9 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 22.6% $0.91 159
10 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 14.1% $16.68 242
11 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 9.4% $0.04 7
12 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 5.7% $0.03 14
13 Gemini 3 Flash Google 3.0% $0.33 110