ProgramBench task detail

cmatsuoka__figlet.202a0a8

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

872generated behavioral tests
77.5%official best score
84.1%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 84.1% ok 733/872 $7.34 89 0.31h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 41.1% ok 358/872 n/a 118 0.35h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 39.1% ok 341/872 n/a 111 0.34h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

84.1% from 733/872 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 141, passed: 903.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • 18e5fb09a17a tests.test_control_file_errors.test_control_file_escape_f_v (failure)
  • 18e5fb09a17a tests.test_control_file_errors.test_control_file_char_range (failure)
  • 18e5fb09a17a tests.test_encoding.test_utf8_copyright_symbols (failure)
  • 18e5fb09a17a tests.test_errors.test_corrupted_font_file_invalid_magic (failure)
  • 18e5fb09a17a tests.test_control_file_errors.test_control_file_invalid_g_command (failure)
  • 18e5fb09a17a tests.test_errors.test_null_byte_in_input (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 77.5% $18.00 279
2 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 76.7% $82.10 502
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 72.6% $15.89 137
4 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 72.2% $8.06 134
5 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 69.6% $6.70 74
6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 67.0% $44.94 645
7 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 45.5% $2.94 37
8 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 42.8% $0.52 16
9 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 40.5% $1.73 90
10 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 37.4% $1.43 196
11 Gemini 3 Flash Google 30.3% $0.28 68
12 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 9.1% $0.03 10
13 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 2.3% $0.03 17