ProgramBench task detail

hairyhenderson__gomplate.05eb3aa

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

2926generated behavioral tests
74.7%official best score
69.5%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 69.5% ok 2033/2926 $9.60 131 0.45h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 51.2% ok 1499/2926 n/a 75 0.26h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 2.1% ok 60/2926 n/a 58 0.22h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

69.5% from 2033/2926 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 1307, passed: 2209, skipped: 21.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • c9670de85f04 tests.test_comprehensive_scenarios.test_string_manipulation_chain (failure)
  • c9670de85f04 tests.test_base64_functions.test_base64_encode_urlsafe (failure)
  • c9670de85f04 tests.test_advanced_features.test_nested_template (failure)
  • c9670de85f04 tests.test_additional_functions.test_math_seq_with_step (failure)
  • c9670de85f04 tests.test_additional_functions.test_multiple_delimiters_in_one_template (failure)
  • c9670de85f04 tests.test_comprehensive_scenarios.test_function_composition (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 74.7% $22.13 450
2 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 71.8% $5.18 46
3 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 70.9% $14.37 258
4 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 57.6% $6.97 133
5 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 54.7% $8.30 70
6 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 52.1% $1.56 22
7 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 41.1% $4.69 89
8 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 19.3% $0.46 12
9 Gemini 3 Flash Google 17.1% $0.24 89
10 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 14.4% $0.48 98
11 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 10.4% $0.02 17
12 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 8.6% $0.05 10
13 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 0.0% $0.90 86