ProgramBench task detail

johnkerl__miller.8d85b46

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

14637generated behavioral tests
24.1%official best score
32.1%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 32.1% ok 4694/14637 $7.10 97 0.36h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 28.3% ok 4147/14637 n/a 41 0.29h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 27.6% ok 4044/14637 n/a 63 0.27h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

32.1% from 4694/14637 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 10248, passed: 5779, skipped: 2.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch, interactive terminal behavior mismatch.

  • c55c103e74ae eval.tests.test_coverage_boost_50.test_reorder_verb (failure)
  • c55c103e74ae eval.tests.test_absolute_final.test_a36 (failure)
  • c55c103e74ae eval.tests.test_basic_invocation.test_help_list_functions (failure)
  • c55c103e74ae eval.tests.test_absolute_final_push_50.test_acosh_function (failure)
  • c55c103e74ae eval.tests.test_coverage_boost_50.test_sec2gmt_verb (failure)
  • c55c103e74ae eval.tests.test_absolute_final_push_50.test_contains_true (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 24.1% $8.12 127
2 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 23.4% $3.02 26
3 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 22.9% $13.86 322
4 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 19.0% $2.86 62
5 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 16.9% $1.02 15
6 Gemini 3 Flash Google 11.5% $0.20 58
7 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 8.0% $0.32 11
8 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 4.9% $1.61 206
9 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 4.8% $0.95 59
10 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 4.7% $0.02 8
11 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 3.4% $0.02 12
12 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 0.0% $5.15 60
13 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 0.0% $5.77 286