ProgramBench task detail

nuta__nsh.bdd0702

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

1963generated behavioral tests
83.7%official best score
79.3%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 79.3% ok 1556/1963 $5.45 82 0.31h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 70.8% ok 1389/1963 n/a 107 0.25h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 69.1% ok 1357/1963 n/a 67 0.24h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

79.3% from 1556/1963 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 421, passed: 1856, skipped: 12.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • 90713bdac2dd eval.tests.test_coverage_50_boost.test_cd_dash_previous (failure)
  • 90713bdac2dd eval.tests.test_control_structures.test_case_statement (failure)
  • 90713bdac2dd eval.tests.test_comprehensive.test_arithmetic_negative (failure)
  • 90713bdac2dd eval.tests.test_conditionals.test_double_bracket_or (failure)
  • 90713bdac2dd eval.tests.test_coverage_50_boost.test_source_nonexistent (failure)
  • 90713bdac2dd eval.tests.test_control_structures.test_c_style_for_loop (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 83.7% $0.92 64
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 81.0% $9.98 81
3 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 80.6% $27.07 496
4 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 76.9% $13.22 304
5 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 76.1% $0.01 10
6 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 71.3% $5.86 116
7 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 66.1% $3.70 92
8 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 52.9% $1.33 23
9 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 50.2% $0.19 8
10 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 36.8% $1.16 148
11 Gemini 3 Flash Google 31.3% $0.28 122
12 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 0.0% $0.02 14
13 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI n/a $2.79 42