ProgramBench task detail

quinn-rs__quinn.bb359cc

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

522generated behavioral tests
84.5%official best score
63.2%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 63.2% ok 330/522 n/a 67 0.18h not exported
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 55.2% ok 288/522 $2.64 54 0.16h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 51.1% ok 267/522 n/a 97 0.23h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

55.2% from 288/522 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 269, passed: 328, skipped: 2.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • 66fdfa416565 eval.tests.test_argument_parsing.test_client_upload_size_formats (failure)
  • 66fdfa416565 eval.tests.test_argument_parsing.test_client_custom_host (failure)
  • 66fdfa416565 eval.tests.test_argument_parsing.test_server_buffer_size_with_M (failure)
  • 66fdfa416565 eval.tests.test_argument_parsing.test_server_buffer_size_plain_number (failure)
  • 66fdfa416565 eval.tests.test_advanced_options.test_server_with_initial_rtt (failure)
  • 66fdfa416565 eval.tests.test_advanced_options.test_server_with_multiple_options (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 84.5% $3.83 40
2 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 73.0% $3.09 34
3 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 63.4% $5.00 117
4 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 62.3% $1.31 18
5 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 61.7% $7.44 147
6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 57.3% $16.65 375
7 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 56.5% $1.99 88
8 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 53.8% $2.27 54
9 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 46.9% $0.31 10
10 Gemini 3 Flash Google 26.2% $0.32 88
11 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 26.2% $0.51 92
12 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 20.9% $0.04 9
13 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 19.3% $0.02 9