ProgramBench task detail

rbakbashev__elfcat.52f8cc7

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

564generated behavioral tests
98.2%official best score
75.9%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 75.9% ok 428/564 $4.24 54 0.19h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 71.5% ok 403/564 n/a 57 0.20h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 41.3% ok 233/564 n/a 46 0.16h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

75.9% from 428/564 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 142, passed: 503, skipped: 1.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch, exact version/output mismatch.

  • f75c6d083a5c eval.tests.test_output_generation.test_html_contains_css (failure)
  • a2367572e7fc tests.test_elf_variants.test_elf_with_abi_version (failure)
  • 0b64bd84aa2b tests.test_edge_cases.test_section_names_with_html_special_characters (failure)
  • 0b64bd84aa2b tests.test_cli_errors.test_concurrent_different_files (failure)
  • 0b64bd84aa2b tests.test_cli_errors.test_special_chars_in_filename (failure)
  • 0b64bd84aa2b tests.test_cli_errors.test_output_filename_pattern (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 98.2% $23.52 271
2 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 92.9% $15.79 251
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 87.6% $7.57 73
4 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 85.1% $19.73 243
5 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 82.8% $9.37 65
6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 81.6% $23.39 403
7 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 65.4% $0.96 15
8 Gemini 3 Flash Google 53.2% $0.51 139
9 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 45.2% $2.90 140
10 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 27.5% $0.46 89
11 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 19.1% $0.03 9
12 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 2.7% $0.04 26
13 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 2.5% $0.19 10