ProgramBench task detail

riquito__tuc.16fb471

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

1196generated behavioral tests
96.1%official best score
93.3%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 93.3% ok 1116/1196 n/a 44 0.19h not exported
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 92.6% ok 1108/1196 $5.68 86 0.26h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 86.5% ok 1035/1196 n/a 40 0.16h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

92.6% from 1108/1196 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 88, passed: 1157, skipped: 4.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • e73d7b48bf09 eval.tests.test_error_combinations.test_json_with_no_join_conflict (failure)
  • e73d7b48bf09 eval.tests.test_error_combinations.test_json_with_replace_conflict (failure)
  • e73d7b48bf09 eval.tests.test_error_combinations.test_characters_with_no_join_conflict (failure)
  • e73d7b48bf09 eval.tests.test_error_combinations.test_fixed_memory_zero_error (failure)
  • e57edf5017f8 eval.tests.test_field_selection.test_format_with_newline (failure)
  • e57edf5017f8 eval.tests.test_field_selection.test_format_with_tab (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 96.1% $12.77 105
2 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 92.7% $8.58 165
3 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 90.5% $16.11 317
4 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 89.5% $4.67 47
5 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 88.6% $15.11 188
6 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 88.1% $16.19 506
7 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 60.7% $0.89 13
8 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 58.9% $0.94 182
9 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 53.8% $0.30 10
10 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 37.0% $0.02 14
11 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 17.1% $0.94 87
12 Gemini 3 Flash Google 1.5% $0.28 82
13 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 0.0% $0.04 22