ProgramBench task detail

sibprogrammer__xq.b89f681

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

792generated behavioral tests
86.5%official best score
83.2%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 83.2% ok 659/792 $5.63 99 0.26h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 44.9% ok 356/792 n/a 50 0.20h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 44.6% ok 353/792 n/a 42 0.16h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

83.2% from 659/792 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 136, passed: 741, skipped: 2.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • 4bb8d103b799 eval.tests.test_css_selector.test_css_attr_requires_query (failure)
  • 4bb8d103b799 eval.tests.test_edge_cases.test_malformed_xml (failure)
  • 4bb8d103b799 eval.tests.test_config.test_config_tab_setting (failure)
  • 4bb8d103b799 eval.tests.test_json_output.test_json_to_json_pass_through (failure)
  • 4bb8d103b799 eval.tests.test_xml_formatting.test_format_xml_zero_indent (failure)
  • cd8785aceaba eval.tests.test_additional_coverage.test_json_to_json_with_formatting (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 86.5% $10.18 99
2 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 79.0% $12.57 214
3 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 75.9% $13.82 356
4 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 75.8% $3.52 37
5 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 75.0% $26.84 625
6 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 72.7% $0.87 16
7 Gemini 3 Flash Google 63.5% $0.31 111
8 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 63.1% $2.94 158
9 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 57.8% $0.66 11
10 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 37.8% $0.98 103
11 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 37.0% $0.06 13
12 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 2.5% $11.86 227
13 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 1.5% $0.03 15