ProgramBench task detail

svenstaro__genact.16f96e3

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

232generated behavioral tests
71.1%official best score
52.2%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 52.2% ok 121/232 n/a 55 0.18h not exported
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 48.7% ok 113/232 $3.17 35 0.15h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 35.8% ok 83/232 n/a 41 0.21h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

48.7% from 113/232 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 121, passed: 116.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch, exact version/output mismatch.

  • bc90bea37ab6 tests.test_cli.test_speed_factor_negative_rejected (failure)
  • bc90bea37ab6 tests.test_cli.test_help_short_flag (failure)
  • bc90bea37ab6 tests.test_error_paths.test_exit_after_modules_negative_rejected (failure)
  • bc90bea37ab6 tests.test_error_paths.test_instant_print_lines_negative_rejected (failure)
  • bc90bea37ab6 tests.test_core_coverage.test_mkinitcpio_os_release (failure)
  • bc90bea37ab6 tests.test_error_paths.test_modules_empty_string_rejected (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 71.1% $5.22 42
2 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 59.1% $17.93 298
3 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 53.0% $11.11 158
4 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 48.7% $3.83 71
5 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 36.6% $2.91 24
6 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 35.8% $1.25 44
7 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 24.1% $0.46 10
8 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 24.1% $0.58 79
9 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 23.3% $1.70 49
10 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 23.3% $0.94 13
11 Gemini 3 Flash Google 20.7% $0.47 48
12 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 12.5% $0.02 10
13 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 1.7% $0.02 9