ProgramBench task detail

xampprocky__tokei.505d648

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

732generated behavioral tests
69.5%official best score
70.4%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 70.4% ok 515/732 n/a 41 0.17h not exported
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 65.8% ok 482/732 $3.29 53 0.24h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 56.6% ok 414/732 n/a 55 0.19h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

65.8% from 482/732 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: error: 1, failure: 251, passed: 505, skipped: 3.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • 62a430dc1ca2 eval.tests.test_error_cases.test_negative_column_width (failure)
  • 62a430dc1ca2 eval.tests.test_error_cases.test_invalid_column_width (failure)
  • 62a430dc1ca2 eval.tests.test_input_output.test_input_short_flag (failure)
  • 62a430dc1ca2 eval.tests.test_input_output.test_input_from_stdin (failure)
  • 62a430dc1ca2 eval.tests.test_input_output.test_input_from_json_file (failure)
  • d6cf5754a29c tests.test_cli_utils.test_embedded_languages_with_narrow_columns (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 69.5% $21.30 409
2 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 62.6% $11.82 171
3 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 60.9% $2.96 27
4 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 54.8% $3.25 95
5 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 53.4% $1.81 112
6 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 51.0% $1.57 19
7 Gemini 3 Flash Google 40.6% $0.26 71
8 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 32.0% $0.39 11
9 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 27.0% $0.71 94
10 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 12.2% $0.01 8
11 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 8.1% $0.04 8
12 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 2.0% $10.01 98
13 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 0.0% $2.82 193