ProgramBench task detail

yaa110__nomino.f892499

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

313generated behavioral tests
94.2%official best score
88.5%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 88.5% ok 277/313 $3.41 65 0.19h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 88.2% ok 276/313 n/a 59 0.16h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 80.8% ok 253/313 n/a 59 0.20h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

88.5% from 277/313 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 36, passed: 302.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • edd50f76563b eval.tests.test_map_mode.test_map_with_missing_source_files (failure)
  • 71456d35eecf tests.test_errors.test_invalid_regex_unclosed_group (failure)
  • 71456d35eecf tests.test_errors.test_invalid_map_not_json (failure)
  • 71456d35eecf tests.test_errors.test_invalid_map_malformed_json (failure)
  • 71456d35eecf tests.test_errors.test_conflict_without_overwrite_prepends_underscore (failure)
  • 71456d35eecf tests.test_errors.test_no_source_option_provided (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 94.2% $5.15 70
2 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 85.0% $2.16 35
3 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 83.4% $1.30 27
4 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 79.9% $19.28 518
5 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 79.6% $4.21 119
6 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 72.2% $10.11 270
7 Gemini 3 Flash Google 61.0% $0.29 142
8 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 53.7% $1.54 170
9 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 51.4% $0.30 15
10 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 26.5% $0.66 114
11 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 15.0% $0.02 11
12 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 5.8% $0.05 16
13 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 2.9% $16.99 247