ProgramBench task detail

yoav-lavi__melody.f4af9b4

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

1205generated behavioral tests
87.4%official best score
74.1%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 74.1% ok 893/1205 $4.67 79 0.24h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 23.8% ok 287/1205 n/a 124 0.37h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 19.9% ok 240/1205 n/a 155 0.23h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

74.1% from 893/1205 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: error: 1, failure: 382, passed: 1051, skipped: 4.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch.

  • 84620c2d0270 eval.tests.test_additional_symbols.test_symbol_return (failure)
  • 84620c2d0270 eval.tests.test_any_quantifier.test_lazy_any_of (failure)
  • 84620c2d0270 eval.tests.test_boundary_and_special.test_vertical_tab (failure)
  • 84620c2d0270 eval.tests.test_advanced_features.test_lazy_quantifier (failure)
  • 84620c2d0270 eval.tests.test_compiler_errors.test_unrecognized_symbol_namespace (failure)
  • 84620c2d0270 eval.tests.test_advanced_features.test_variables_basic (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 87.4% $17.22 215
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 84.9% $4.22 56
3 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 78.9% $5.37 135
4 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 74.4% $12.05 325
5 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 71.5% $3.79 54
6 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 62.3% $1.25 21
7 Gemini 3 Flash Google 62.3% $0.28 138
8 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 34.2% $0.45 19
9 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 31.4% $0.98 131
10 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 6.4% $0.03 9
11 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 6.1% $2.10 203
12 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 3.4% $16.67 502
13 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 3.4% $0.04 25