ProgramBench task detail

ys-l__flamelens.0b4dc33

Task-level results for this Codex /goal scaffold. ProgramBench baseline context is cached from the official task page; Codex scored tests are after active-branch and ignored-test filtering.

224generated behavioral tests
62.1%official best score
58.0%Codex best score
3Codex result rows

Codex Results by Model

#ModelRunAgentModeScoreEvalTestsEst. costCallsWallEvidence
1 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260517T094700Z Codex /goal Mini-SWE-compatible no internet 58.0% ok 130/224 $3.31 56 0.32h manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit
2 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260519T215046Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + Goal contract no internet 37.9% ok 85/224 n/a 68 0.18h not exported
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) 20260518T232006Z Codex /goal Paper prompt + /goal no internet 25.4% ok 57/224 n/a 46 0.12h not exported

Why Scores Differ

Official ProgramBench rows are the public mini-SWE-agent submissions. GoalBench rows are separate Codex /goal submissions. Same model label does not mean the same agent, prompt, tool loop, or generated implementation. A GoalBench row is resolved only when the ProgramBench-scored pass rate is exactly 100%.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260517T094700Z

58.0% from 130/224 ProgramBench-scored tests. Raw public eval statuses: failure: 109, passed: 189, skipped: 13.

Agent trace summary unavailable.

Likely miss class: behavioral mismatch, interactive terminal behavior mismatch, terminal rendering mismatch.

  • e2bdc309a3c0 eval.tests.test_basic.test_metadata_lines_ignored (failure)
  • 2b31a0cff240 tests.test_harvest.test_fixture_top_view[invalid-lines] (failure)
  • 2b31a0cff240 tests.test_harvest.test_fixture_top_view[recursive] (failure)
  • 2b31a0cff240 tests.test_harvest.test_sorted_flag (failure)
  • 2b31a0cff240 tests.test_harvest.test_recursive_stacks (failure)
  • 2b31a0cff240 tests.test_harvest.test_invalid_lines_handling (failure)

manifest · eval json · eval summary · usage audit

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260519T215046Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

GPT 5.5 (xhigh) · 20260518T232006Z

Public eval evidence has not been exported for this row yet.

Official ProgramBench Results by Model

#ModelProviderScoreCostCalls
1 GPT 5.5 (high) OpenAI 62.1% $2.47 49
2 Claude Opus 4.6 Anthropic 59.4% $15.81 252
3 GPT 5.5 (xhigh) OpenAI 57.6% $4.30 48
4 Claude Sonnet 4.6 Anthropic 57.6% $43.26 490
5 Claude Opus 4.7 Anthropic 57.1% $1.38 62
6 GPT 5.5 OpenAI 55.8% $0.95 14
7 Gemini 3 Flash Google 44.2% $0.19 57
8 Claude Haiku 4.5 Anthropic 41.5% $0.82 157
9 GPT 5.4 OpenAI 21.9% $0.07 7
10 GPT 5.4 mini OpenAI 17.0% $0.01 8
11 Gemini 3.1 Pro Google 14.7% $2.25 77
12 GPT 5 mini OpenAI 13.8% $0.02 11
13 Claude Opus 4.7 (xhigh) Anthropic 1.3% $5.90 135